Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and People Choices, 29(2), 119�126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The place out of attachment inside the people mating. Writeup on Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186�204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Web sites paradox revisited. Record away from Social Situations, 58(1), 49�74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal tech you to definitely minimizes social involvement and you can psychological really-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.
The key benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization plus the framework away from pleasure for the personal relationships
Kreider, R.Yards., & Fields, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, time, and you can lifetime of marriages and divorces. Latest Inhabitants Accounts, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional analysis of closeness, passions, and you can connection: Review the new presumptions of your own triangular principle out-of like. Emotional Records, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Feeling greatest throughout the carrying out tough: Personal reviews contained in this intimate relationships. Diary out-of Personality and you may Public Psychology, 87(1), 80�95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Journal from Character and you can Personal Psychology, 97(1), 74�87.
Intrasexual vigilance: The new implicit cognition away from intimate competition
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial. https://besthookupwebsites.org/tinder-plus-vs-tinder-gold, & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can glamorous alternatives: The latest progressed psychology from relationships fix. Evolution and you may Individual Decisions, 29(5), 343�349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential data away from dispute and accord in distressed and you may nondistressed relationship couples. Diary off Contacting and you can Systematic Mindset, 49(4), 554�567.
McKenna, K. Y. A good., Green, A. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Matchmaking development online: What is the big attraction? Log away from Personal Facts, 58(1), 9�29.
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-evaluation motives in the romantic matchmaking: A style of globally enhancement and you will particular verification. In the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Skills ents on the examination of couples communication (pp. 32�58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Push.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-therapist thread from contact lens out-of attachment principle. Psychotherapy: Concept, Browse, Habit, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The new public overseeing program: Improved awareness so you’re able to social cues because the a transformative a reaction to social different. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh personal outcast: Ostracism, societal difference, getting rejected, and intimidation (pp. 213�226). New york, NY: Therapy Drive.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Globally and you may certain relational patterns regarding the contact with public connections. Log off Identity and you can Personal Therapy, 80(4), 613�631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will guidance looking to into the personal relationship. Character and you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will particular connection representations into the adulthood: Could there be a relationship?. Diary Of Public And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. An effective. (2001)mitment and you can relationships restoration systems. In the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic intimate matchmaking: Restoration and you may improvement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection in person impact one of spouses since a purpose of brand new resemblance in their shared enjoy. Identity And you can Public Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience from extrinsic benefits on liking and you can loving. Log regarding Character and you may Social Mindset, 38(3), 453�460.