Like, attention, together with suppression regarding opinion out of close choice

Like, attention, together with suppression regarding opinion out of close choice

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and People Choices, 29(2), 119�126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The place out of attachment inside the people mating. Writeup on Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186�204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Web sites paradox revisited. Record away from Social Situations, 58(1), 49�74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal tech you to definitely minimizes social involvement and you can psychological really-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.

The key benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization plus the framework away from pleasure for the personal relationships

Kreider, R.Yards., & Fields, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, time, and you can lifetime of marriages and divorces. Latest Inhabitants Accounts, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional analysis of closeness, passions, and you can connection: Review the new presumptions of your own triangular principle out-of like. Emotional Records, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Feeling greatest throughout the carrying out tough: Personal reviews contained in this intimate relationships. Diary out-of Personality and you may Public Psychology, 87(1), 80�95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Journal from Character and you can Personal Psychology, 97(1), 74�87.

Intrasexual vigilance: The new implicit cognition away from intimate competition

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can glamorous alternatives: The latest progressed psychology from relationships fix. Evolution and you may Individual Decisions, 29(5), 343�349.

pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential data away from dispute and accord in distressed and you may nondistressed relationship couples. Diary off Contacting and you can Systematic Mindset, 49(4), 554�567.

McKenna, K. Y. A good., Green, A. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Matchmaking development online: What is the big attraction? Log away from Personal Facts, 58(1), 9�29.

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-evaluation motives in the romantic matchmaking: A style of globally enhancement and you will particular verification. In the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Skills ents on the examination of couples communication (pp. 32�58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Push.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the client-therapist thread from contact lens out-of attachment principle. Psychotherapy: Concept, Browse, Habit, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The new public overseeing program: Improved awareness so you’re able to social cues because the a transformative a reaction to social different. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh personal outcast: Ostracism, societal difference, getting rejected, and intimidation (pp. 213�226). New york, NY: Therapy Drive.

Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Globally and you may certain relational patterns regarding the contact with public connections. Log off Identity and you can Personal Therapy, 80(4), 613�631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will guidance looking to into the personal relationship. Character and you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you will particular connection representations into the adulthood: Could there be a relationship?. Diary Of Public And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. An effective. (2001)mitment and you can relationships restoration systems. In the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic intimate matchmaking: Restoration and you may improvement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection in person impact one of spouses since a purpose of brand new resemblance in their shared enjoy. Identity And you can Public Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience from extrinsic benefits on liking and you can loving. Log regarding Character and you may Social Mindset, 38(3), 453�460.

Esta web usa cookies para ofrecerle una mejor experiencia.    Saber más.